Mississippi High Court: Expert Must Rebut Evidence Of No General Acceptance
JACKSON, Miss. - When an expert's reliability is attacked with evidence that his opinion is not generally accepted, the expert should at least provide minimal evidence supporting his opinion, the Mississippi Supreme Court held Jan. 28 in finding that a trial court correctly excluded a medical standard of care expert from a malpractice case (Shanika Hill, et al. v. Stephen Mills, No. 2008-CA-01343-SCT, Miss. Sup.; 2010 Miss. LEXIS 42). Full story on lexis.comFiled by admin at February 28th, 2010 under News